<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Air America Early Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2004/04/01/air-america-early-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2004/04/01/air-america-early-review/</link>
	<description>Insight - Foresight - Hindsight</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Freedman</title>
		<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2004/04/01/air-america-early-review/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/?p=421#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I did get to listen to (much of) the first day of Air America Radio.  I thought it was done well.  There were tech. glitches and some problems with dead air between segments.  However, the topics were good and the discussions that developed from callers were insightful.  With time, as you pointed out, Air America will have to find its own in order to last. Yesterday I think proved to be a great starting point.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did get to listen to (much of) the first day of Air America Radio.  I thought it was done well.  There were tech. glitches and some problems with dead air between segments.  However, the topics were good and the discussions that developed from callers were insightful.  With time, as you pointed out, Air America will have to find its own in order to last. Yesterday I think proved to be a great starting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
