<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urgent Nonbinding Resolutions And Other Aurora Paradoxes In Parental Notification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/</link>
	<description>Insight - Foresight - Hindsight</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert L. Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28480</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert L. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28480</guid>
		<description>The key once again is to regulate  these places since it is legal at this point. I will work on this and ask others to do so.

ROBERT JONES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key once again is to regulate  these places since it is legal at this point. I will work on this and ask others to do so.</p>
<p>ROBERT JONES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert L. Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28192</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert L. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28192</guid>
		<description>Yes. If they like the idea of dismemberment and killing of innocent babies by hacks, then I guess they would. I can't figure this out? The talk is " don't kill people in the Iraq", but it's ok to kill a baby?  I think we should not play God!


-Robert Jones
www.democratsforlife.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. If they like the idea of dismemberment and killing of innocent babies by hacks, then I guess they would. I can&#8217;t figure this out? The talk is &#8221; don&#8217;t kill people in the Iraq&#8221;, but it&#8217;s ok to kill a baby?  I think we should not play God!</p>
<p>-Robert Jones<br />
<a href="http://www.democratsforlife.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.democratsforlife.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenlineBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28177</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenlineBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28177</guid>
		<description>Update - the BGI committee deferred to the GO committee, extending an olive branch and compromise.

They sent the resolution to GO with the request there is a special meeting for this issue sooner so it can be discussed by the full city council.

We hope the GO committee reciprocates and we can be happy again :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update - the BGI committee deferred to the GO committee, extending an olive branch and compromise.</p>
<p>They sent the resolution to GO with the request there is a special meeting for this issue sooner so it can be discussed by the full city council.</p>
<p>We hope the GO committee reciprocates and we can be happy again <img src='http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiram Wurf</title>
		<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28170</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiram Wurf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28170</guid>
		<description>Hi Openline,

Thanks for the comment!

I'm in 'off and running' mode right now, but I do appreciate your distinction between the Ordinance and Resolution - it's an important one.  I'll chime in again after I've taken a look at what you've written, but my quick take right now is that the BGI Committee still has no proper business with this issue at all.  Your final paragraph is noted, and in saying what I did I wasn't make a pro- or con- issue of things - and I recognize that this issue isn't necessarily the same as people's other views on abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Openline,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in &#8216;off and running&#8217; mode right now, but I do appreciate your distinction between the Ordinance and Resolution - it&#8217;s an important one.  I&#8217;ll chime in again after I&#8217;ve taken a look at what you&#8217;ve written, but my quick take right now is that the BGI Committee still has no proper business with this issue at all.  Your final paragraph is noted, and in saying what I did I wasn&#8217;t make a pro- or con- issue of things - and I recognize that this issue isn&#8217;t necessarily the same as people&#8217;s other views on abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenlineBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28142</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenlineBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/2007/10/26/urgent-nonbinding-resolutions-and-other-aurora-paradoxes-in-parental-notification/#comment-28142</guid>
		<description>Hiram, we've taken a position on this, but just a couple clarifications for everyone.  There are two issues.  A parental notification ORDINANCE and a parental notification RESOLUTION.

Our "solution" for the dueling committees are that the ordinance go through the Government Operations Cmte and the non-binding resolution go through the BGI committee, BUT technically, both can go straight to the Commitee-of-the-Whole in a special meeting that can be called at any time by three (3) aldermen.

In other words, all this stuff about which committee is just a temporary issue, at least for the resolution.  It will end up in the full committee-of-the-whole.

Last, but not least, it might be important to know there are pro-choice supporters not only supportive of the ordinance, but who helped with it.  We don't view it as a pro-life vs. pro-choice issue, even though we understand that is how some might take it.

Hope that helps :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiram, we&#8217;ve taken a position on this, but just a couple clarifications for everyone.  There are two issues.  A parental notification ORDINANCE and a parental notification RESOLUTION.</p>
<p>Our &#8220;solution&#8221; for the dueling committees are that the ordinance go through the Government Operations Cmte and the non-binding resolution go through the BGI committee, BUT technically, both can go straight to the Commitee-of-the-Whole in a special meeting that can be called at any time by three (3) aldermen.</p>
<p>In other words, all this stuff about which committee is just a temporary issue, at least for the resolution.  It will end up in the full committee-of-the-whole.</p>
<p>Last, but not least, it might be important to know there are pro-choice supporters not only supportive of the ordinance, but who helped with it.  We don&#8217;t view it as a pro-life vs. pro-choice issue, even though we understand that is how some might take it.</p>
<p>Hope that helps <img src='http://www.wurfwhile.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
